<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Atom Processor Benchmarked</title>
	<link>http://laptoping.com/intel-atom-benchmark.html</link>
	<description>Notebooks, Tablets, UMPCs, Laptop-Like Devices - News, Reviews, Deals</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Intel Atom Processor Benchmarked by: Manuel</title>
		<link>http://laptoping.com/intel-atom-benchmark.html#comment-218305</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://laptoping.com/intel-atom-benchmark.html#comment-218305</guid>
					<description>Celeron M 530 1.6GHz, SuperPi 1M-&amp;#62;47s...

I prefer a CeleronM...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Celeron M 530 1.6GHz, SuperPi 1M-&gt;47s&#8230;</p>
	<p>I prefer a CeleronM&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Intel Atom Processor Benchmarked by: Jean-Baptiste</title>
		<link>http://laptoping.com/intel-atom-benchmark.html#comment-129656</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://laptoping.com/intel-atom-benchmark.html#comment-129656</guid>
					<description>Intel confirmed that Silverthorne/Atom is half the performance of the Celeron. Check the video interview on our site:
http://www.uberpulse.com/us/2008/03/chip_shot_intel_atom_is_half_the_performance_of_celeron_video.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Intel confirmed that Silverthorne/Atom is half the performance of the Celeron. Check the video interview on our site:<br />
<a href='http://www.uberpulse.com/us/2008/03/chip_shot_intel_atom_is_half_the_performance_of_celeron_video.php' rel='nofollow'>http://www.uberpulse.com/us/2008/03/chip_shot_intel_atom_is_half_the_performance_of_celeron_video.php</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
