AMD E2-9000e Entry-Level Laptop CPU

The AMD E2-9000e is a budget-class laptop processor (CPU). You can find it in various affordable notebook models. The E2-9000e is a dual-core chip with clock speed of up to 2 GHz and 1MB of cache. These modest specs mean the CPU can deliver basic computing performance, which is suitable only for non-demanding PC tasks like web browsing with small number of browser tabs running simultaneously, light work in MS Office apps, or video / audio playback. The chip is not suitable for heavier duties like content creation. On the positive side, the E2-9000e has a power consumption of only 6 Watts, meaning that it is battery life friendly.

AMD E2-9000e Benchmark

AMD E2-9000e Benchmark

As expected, User Benchmark CPU test puts the AMD E2-9000e near the bottom of the CPU score list. However, the E2 is slightly faster than its direct competitor by Intel – the Celeron N3350.

As for gaming, the included AMD Radeon R2 integrated graphics is able to run many of the popular (but light) game titles, as you can see in the video playlist below:

 

Specifications of the AMD E2-9000e

Here's the specs sheet of the AMD E2-9000e:

Processor Name

AMD E2-9000e

CPU Family

AMD E-Series "Stoney Ridge"

Number of Cores

Dual-core / 1 thread per core

CPU Clock Speed

Base: 1.5GHz, Burst: up to 2GHz

Cache Size

1MB

Memory Support

DDR4 2400MHz

Integrated Graphics

AMD Radeon R2 Series

Power Consumption

6W

Production Technology

28-nanometer

Technologies

AMD-V Virtualization

Typical Use

Affordable Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs

User Benchmark Average CPU Score

13.4

Category:

Written by on October 4, 2017

User reviews, comments, and Q&A on the AMD E2-9000e

Below you can read and submit user reviews, comments, questions, and answers regarding the processor. Thank you for your contribution.

  1. John IL

    Well its certainly pathetically slow chip. Battery life isn’t going to fix the terrible experience using this chip. Dell is using this chip in cheap 11″ 3000 series replacing the Celeron 3060 but its not a big improvement for sure.

Your input

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share this page: